hfinkel added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13304#269049, @junbuml wrote:
> I just want to ping one more time to see if there is any objection about the > basic idea of this change. If the basic idea itself is acceptable, then I > want to find the best way to get idea in. > > Please let me know any new suggestion or any opinion about moving this > implementation back to backend (maybe in PrunceEH.cpp) with the minimum > callee size check to avoid blindly marking noinlines on all callsites. I will > be happy to hear any opinion. It seems like we want two things here: 1. Mark the exception-handling intrinsics as cold 2. Have the inliner not inline things in cold regions What is preventing us from doing this now? http://reviews.llvm.org/D13304 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
