rjmccall added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12614#274349, @sfantao wrote:
> Hi John, > > Thanks for the remark! > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12614#272354, @rjmccall wrote: > > > CurFuncDecl is supposed to be the enclosing user function. Things like > > outlined functions should be getting stored in CurCodeDecl; that's how it's > > done for blocks and lambdas. > > > Apologies I was not accurate in my previous post. `CurFuncDecl` is in fact > the declaration of the enclosing user function. What is not defined in some > times undefined is `CurGD` and this is what I was trying to use to get the > right mangled name of the user function, given that it also encodes the > structor type. So my question is: is there a good/safe way to get the mangled > name of the user function given the function declaration? I didn't find any > good way to do that without replicating part of the stuff that happens in the > mangler. You don't actually want the structor type of the parent, because the nested declaration is logically the same declaration across all of them. For example, a lambda used in a constructor is still just a single type; there aren't implicitly 1-3 different types just because there are 1-3 different variant entrypoints for the constructor. The way this generally works is that you just pick a single canonical variant. For example, the Itanium ABI says that you mangle local entities within constructors as if they were defined within the complete-object variant. If you want to add a method to one of the CXXABI objects to pick a canonical GD for a declaration, feel free. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12614 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
