alexfh added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9556#282718, @xazax.hun wrote:
> Unfortunately I had no time to work on this patch, and after I did not finish > this the team I was working in took a different approach: running static > analyzer checker through clang and tidy checkers through clang tidy. > Initially we wanted to avoid this approach, because they are invoked > differently. I have no interest finishing this patch at the moment, but I can > not tell for sure for the future. Should I abadon this? If it's not needed, then probably yes. http://reviews.llvm.org/D9556 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
