rnk accepted this revision. rnk added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I went ahead and ran some of your test cases through MSVC, and I agree with your results. This is pretty interesting behavior. Thanks for looking into it! Looks good. ================ Comment at: test/SemaCXX/pragma-vtordisp.cpp:35-37 @@ -34,5 +34,5 @@ struct C { // FIXME: Our implementation based on token insertion makes it impossible for // the pragma to appear everywhere we should support it. //#pragma vtordisp() struct D : virtual A { ---------------- With your changes, can we enable this test? http://reviews.llvm.org/D14467 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits