tejohnson added a comment. > Talked with Duncan, we're not convinced about -fthinlto-backend=... for the > option name: the word backend does not seems right here. What about > -fthinlto-index=...?
I wanted to express that this was invoking a different pipeline, and distinguish from a normal compilation that takes a source file. But I'm ok with your suggestion if you prefer that. ================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp:822 @@ +821,3 @@ + TheModule = std::move(Combined); + } + ---------------- joker.eph wrote: > Could we refactor this in a helper in llvm? I can create a new Linker interface that takes the index path, builds the index, does the link and returns the ErrorOr index. ================ Comment at: test/Driver/thinlto_backend.c:6 @@ +5,3 @@ +// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -O2 -o %t1.o -x ir %t.o -c -fthinlto-backend=%t.thinlto.bc -### 2> %t +// RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-THINLTOBE-ACTION < %t %s +// CHECK-THINLTOBE-ACTION: -fthinlto-backend= ---------------- joker.eph wrote: > Why not pipe to FileCheck here? Will do. I think I cloned this from another test. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15025 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
