Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15332#306831, @danielmarjamaki wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15332#306097, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > > > This check partially implements PR19419. Could it be extended to variables? > > > Yes, I don't see any technical reasons why that would not work. However > politically, some people like const variables and others don't. May be implement as separate check with some code sharing if applicable? http://reviews.llvm.org/D15332 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits