whisperity added inline comments.
================ Comment at: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-ptr-ref.cpp:290 struct IntDynTypedVoidPointerTest1 { - void *vptr; // expected-note{{uninitialized pointee 'this->vptr'}} + void *vptr; // expected-note{{uninitialized pointee 'this->static_cast<int *>(vptr)'}} int dontGetFilteredByNonPedanticMode = 0; ---------------- NoQ wrote: > Shouldn't this rather say something like `static_cast<int *>(this->vptr)`? > That's the normal syntax to do this sort of stuff, i guess. Not just "normal syntax", this syntax of the output does not compile. ``` foo.cpp:6:13: error: expected unqualified-id this->static_cast<int*>(vptr) = new int(); ``` https://reviews.llvm.org/D49228 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits