lebedev.ri abandoned this revision. lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49844#1177273, @rsmith wrote:
> What I requested was that either we make `CastExpr::isPartOfExplicitCast()` > return `true` for `CastExpr`s that are not `ImplicitCastExpr`s, or that we > move `isPartOfExplicitCast` do the `ImplicitCastExpr` derived class. We don't > need to do both, and since we're doing the latter in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D49838, we don't need to do anything else. > (Essentially, my request was to fix the bug that > `CastExpr::isPartOfExplicitCast()` incorrectly returned `false` when called > on an explicit cast expression, and I don't mind which way we fix it.) Ok, no problem at atll, so i have read too much into it :) I will then simply inline this into the only caller. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D49844 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
