ahatanak added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47757#1204561, @tra wrote:
> It's a regression. There's a decent chance it breaks someone and this patch,
> if committed by itself, will end up being rolled back.
Is the regression you are referring to about the static function case? I don't
see a difference between ToT clang and my patch in the diagnostics they produce
when I compile the following code:
__host__ void f();
static __host__ __device__ void g() { f(); }
__host__ __device__ void g2() { g(); }
Both error out when `-fcuda-is-device` is provided. If I comment out the
definition of g2, it compiles fine.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47757
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
