On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:47 PM Gabor Marton via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> martong added a comment.
>
> Ping.
>
> Manuel, I still don't see how could we apply `match(anyOf(node),
> hasDescendant(node))` to the problem of general subtree traversal.
> (I'd like to have support for not just `decl()` but other kind of nodes
> too.)
>
Could you please advise how to move on? Also, could you please describe
> your specific technical arguments against this patch?
>

I'm still trying to understand why it's a good idea :) The general
technical argument why I'm asking all these questions is that we shouldn't
add new things unless they provide significant new features.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to