kbobyrev added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormat.rst:97 +Clangd Integration +================== ---------------- ioeric wrote: > We could recomend formatting with clangd in clangd doc, but advertising here > seems a bit odd. I'd suggest dropping this. > > And to be fair, clang-format editor plugins seem to be provide finer controls > than LSP clients. I agree. clang-format plugins (e.g. [[ https://github.com/rhysd/vim-clang-format | vim-clang-format ]]) aren't advertised here, though. But I was going to have another patch on that, this might be useful for clang-format users; for example I discovered that plugin long after I started using clang-format. https://reviews.llvm.org/D51297 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
