JonasToth added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880#1229513, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Missing tests and changes to Registry.cpp for dynamic matchers. > > Also, do you want to add `isInstantiationDependent()` at the same time, given > the relationship with the other two matchers? Do you mean a matcher that does `return Node.isValueDependent() || Node.isTypeDependent()` or `hasAncestor(expr(anyOf(isValueDependent(), isTypeDependent())))`? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
