ldionne added a comment.

I'm thinking about this some more, and I'm wondering whether it would be a 
viable solution to just exclude members marked with hidden visibility from 
explicit template instantiations (and declarations thereof). I thought I had 
been convinced by Hubert 
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058471.html> that visibility 
and this attribute should be left separate, but now I'm not sure anymore. I 
don't think there's a single case of a member function with hidden visibility 
that we don't want to exclude from explicit instantiations. @rsmith Thoughts?


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D51789



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to