lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================ Comment at: test/Sema/gnu89.c:1-2 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=gnu89 -pedantic -fsyntax-only -verify +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=gnu89 -pedantic -fsyntax-only 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PEDANTIC %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=gnu89 -fsyntax-only 2>&1 | FileCheck %s ---------------- This ideally needs positive tests. E.g.: * `-std=c89` * `-std=c89 -pedantic` * `-std=gnu99` * `-std=gnu99 -pedantic` * `-std=c99` * `-std=c99 -pedantic` ================ Comment at: test/Sema/gnu89.c:16 +// CHECK-PEDANTIC: warning: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier +// CHECK-otherwise-NOT: warning: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier + ---------------- There is no `otherwise` check prefix in the run lines. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52248 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
