yaxunl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52891#1256207, @arsenm wrote:
> I think the name needs work, but I'm not sure what it should be. I think it > should avoid using "non" and "amdgpu" I think dropping amdgpu is fine since we can add (AMDGUP only) to the description of the option, following the precedence of -ffixed-r9 Reserve the r9 register (ARM only) However it is difficult to coin a different term for 'non-kernel-function'. Also, I saw precedence of using 'non' in option name: -objcmt-ns-nonatomic-iosonly So, probably we could use `-fvisibility-nonkernel-function` ? https://reviews.llvm.org/D52891 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
