AntonBikineev marked an inline comment as done. AntonBikineev added a comment.
I've submitted an issue to the Core about the case. Presumably, it will be included in the next revision (mailing deadline of which is tomorrow). ================ Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp:1893 + + IsCtor = isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(TargetDecl); } ---------------- rjmccall wrote: > I feel like you should just use `TargetDecl && > isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(TargetDecl)` below; it's more obvious. > > Is there not an analogous rule for destructors? There appears to be no similar rule for destructors, maybe because at the point of calling a destructor the value of the object/subobjects is well-determined. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46441 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
