davide added a comment. No worries :) l
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44100#1282148, @martong wrote: > Hi Davide, > > I'd like to draw your attention to an important relation of this patch to a > bug in LLDB which manifests as incorrect vtable layouts for LLDB expression > code. > Please see the conversation started with this message: > https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-August/058842.html > I think that the solution to that problem would be exactly this patch, i.e. > to put the methods in the proper order during import. > > Are the failing lldb tests related to ObjC code? Some of them are, see e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/11972/console @shafik is the person who's driving better lldb C++ support on our side, so you might consider chatting with him about this. I just got the bots in a greener state again. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44100 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
