kbobyrev requested changes to this revision.
kbobyrev added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52998#1284146, @eandrews wrote:

> @kbobyrev  I apologize if I was unclear in the comments. I was asking if the 
> changes proposed in the comments are alright with you since they would 
> involve modifying `benchmark/CMakelists.txt` (instead of 
> `llvm/CMakeLists.txt` as discussed in mailing list). As Zachary mentioned in 
> comments, `_HAS_EXCEPTIONS` should be set to 0 only when exceptions are 
> disabled. Since exception handling for benchmarks is handled in 
> `benchmark/CMakeLists.txt`, I think it makes most sense to add the definition 
> there. I have now uploaded the proposed change for review.
>
> I am still working with my company to figure out the corporate CLA Google's 
> benchmark project requires for patch submissions. I can submit the patch 
> upstream once that is done. If you would prefer to submit the patch upstream 
> yourself, please feel free to do so.
>
> Sorry again for the confusion!


Ah, my bad, I didn't notice it's the `utils/benchmark/CMakeLists.txt` :( 
Apologies.

Upstreaming it first might be better, especially since the change seems to be 
trivial. Is this line addition the only change proposed for the benchmark 
library? If so, I could submit a PR and probably get it accepted within the 
next few days. Then this patch would simply add commit hash and small notice to 
`utils/benchmark/README.LLVM` and that would be it.

Do you want me to submit the patch to the benchmark library? It seems that it 
would help to speedup the process.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D52998



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to