mgrang added inline comments.
================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsARM.def:270 +TARGET_HEADER_BUILTIN(_InterlockedCompareExchange64_nf, "LLiLLiD*LLiLLi", "nh", "intrin.h", ALL_MS_LANGUAGES, "") +TARGET_HEADER_BUILTIN(_InterlockedCompareExchange64_rel, "LLiLLiD*LLiLLi", "nh", "intrin.h", ALL_MS_LANGUAGES, "") + ---------------- rnk wrote: > Given how much duplication there is, I think we need to have some kind of > BuiltinsMSVC.def that contains a list of all the interlocked builitin > families, like this: > ``` > INTERLOCKED_BUILTIN(_InterlockedCompareExchange) > INTERLOCKED_BUILTIN(_InterlockedOr) > INTERLOCKED_BUILTIN(_InterlockedAnd) > ``` > We'd include this file here, with INTERLOCKED_BUILTIN defined as: > ``` > #define INTERLOCKED_BUILTIN(Op) \ > TARGET_HEADER_BUILTIN(Op##8_acq, "ccD*cc", "nh", "intrin.h", > ALL_MS_LANGUAGES, "") \ > TARGET_HEADER_BUILTIN(Op##8_nf, "ccD*cc", "nh", "intrin.h", > ALL_MS_LANGUAGES, "") \ > ... > ``` > That'll stamp out the enums that we need, and then we can reuse the .def file > to reduce duplication in the switch/case below. > > Every op is basically 16 operations: {8, 16, 32, 64} X {seq_cst, rel, acq, nf} > > I'm not sure what to do about the ones that overlap with x86. Thanks Reid. Yes, I think we can certainly cleanup further. That being said, can we get these patches committed first and then cleanup in a follow-up patch? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D54062 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits