Ping, is this OK to commit? On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ping. >>>> >>> >> Sorry about that. >> Completely missed this in my email flood. >> >> This approach looks ok to me, but I wonder if it would be better to get >> Apple to fix their iOS C library instead. >> > > Well, it's not broken in the sense that it does what the C standard > library is supposed to do. But it's not providing the "C pieces" of a C++ > standard library. I don't know what its design goal is here, but with this > patch we don't need to care. > > Duncan offered to file a bug on this, but I don't know if that's happened. > > Are there other broken C libraries that we are concerned with? >> > > Probably :) I don't know the complete set of C standard library > implementations that people use with libc++, but I'd be surprised if Darwin > were the only case we need to fix. >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
