zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54187#1290432, @rnk wrote:
> I hadn't realized that Dexter knew how to drive VS tools. I'll have to go > read more and get back to you all. > > I think it would be more promising than attempting to come up with a new > llgdb.py-like abstraction for cdb. Specifically, abstracting over setting > breakpoints and reformatting output is what makes that difficult. Everything > can of course be done with enough effort, but especially in testing, it often > makes sense to trade off duplication between test cases for ease of use. Note that WinDbg (specifically) is an important use case, and uses a different debug engine than VS. So Dexter would (at the very least) need to be extended to support WinDbg (which has the same debugging engine as cdb). But I agree it's worth trying out and seeing what kind of test cases we can and can't fit into it. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54187 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
