Szelethus added inline comments.
================ Comment at: www/analyzer/checker_dev_manual.html:719 +<ul> +<li>User facing documentation is important for adoption! Make sure the check list updated + at the homepage of the analyzer. Also ensure that the description is good quality in ---------------- xazax.hun wrote: > Szelethus wrote: > > Make sure the **checker** list **is** updated > I think at some point we should decide if we prefer the term check or checker > to refer to these things :) Clang Tidy clearly prefers check. That is the distinction I'm aware of too: checkers in the Static Analyzer, checks in clang-tidy. https://reviews.llvm.org/D52984 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
