dblaikie added a comment.
Hey @rjmccall - I'm trying to remember, but can't get it quite clear in my
head. I seem to recall some discussion about trivial_abi not implying/being
strong enough for all the cases that trivial_relocatable sounds like it covers?
Do you happen to remember the distinction there (the summary in this patch
("the warranting attribute [[trivially_relocatable]], which is similar in
spirit to [[trivial_abi]], in that it lets the programmer communicate back to
the compiler that a certain user-defined type should be assumed to have this
property even though it would not naturally have the property all else being
equal.") doesn't sound like what I remember - but my memory is hazy)?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50119
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
