troyj added a comment. I realize that you're probably striving for option compatibility with gcc, but continuing to name it -frecord-gcc-switches when it actually records Clang switches seems weird to me. It almost sounds like something that would dump gcc equivalents of all Clang options, or maybe let you know which Clang options you've used that match gcc options. Either way, by the name -- if you aren't familiar with the gcc option -- it doesn't read like it records Clang options.
Would it be that bad to name it -frecord-clang-switches? Or just -frecord-switches? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D54489 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
