gchatelet added a comment. Thx for the review. I have two suggestions in the comments let me know what you think.
================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:79-81 + // TODO: Provide an automatic fix if the number is exactly representable in the destination type. + f += 2.0; + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: narrowing conversion from constant 'double' to 'float' [cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions] ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > This is not a narrowing conversion -- there should be no diagnostic here. See > [dcl.init.list]p7. Thx for pointing this out. I would like to keep the diagnostic (without mentioning the narrowing) because there is no reason to write `2.0` instead of `2.0f`. WDYT? ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:99 +void narrow_integer_to_floating() { + { + long long ll; // 64 bits ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Missing tests involving literals, which are not narrowing conversions. e.g., > `float f = 1ULL;` should not diagnose. This is handled on l.262 ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:174 + c = uc; + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: narrowing conversion from 'unsigned char' to 'char' is implementation-defined [cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions] + c = us; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > This is only true on architectures where `char` is defined to be `signed > char` rather than `unsigned char`. This is taken care of. The test fails when adding `-funsigned-char`. The current test is executed with `-target x86_64-unknown-linux` which should imply `-fsigned-char`. Anyways, I'll add `-fsigned-char` to make sure this is obvious. ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:188 + i = l; + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: narrowing conversion from 'long' to 'int' is implementation-defined [cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions] + i = ll; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > This is only narrowing if `sizeof(int) < sizeof(long)` which is not the case > on all architectures. Yes this is taken care of in the code, the size of the type must be smaller. It works here because the test runs with `-target x86_64-unknown-linux` ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:211 + ll = ul; + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:8: warning: narrowing conversion from 'unsigned long' to 'long long' is implementation-defined [cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions] + ll = ull; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Whatttt? How does one narrow from an unsigned 32-bit number to a signed > 64-bit number? `unsigned long` is unsigned 64-bit so it does not fit in signed 64-bit. https://godbolt.org/z/VnmG0s ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:228 +void narrow_constant_to_signed_integer_is_not_ok() { + char c1 = -128; + char c2 = 127; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > This may be narrowing on an implementation that defines `char` to be > `unsigned`. Same as previous comments. Would it make sense to create a different test with `-funsigned-char` to check these behaviors? ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions.cpp:232 + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: narrowing conversion from constant value -129 (0xFFFFFF7F) of type 'int' to 'char' is implementation-defined [cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions] + char c4 = 128; + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: narrowing conversion from constant value 128 (0x00000080) of type 'int' to 'char' is implementation-defined [cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions] ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > This may be fine on implementations that define `char` to be `unsigned`. ditto Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D53488 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits