Szelethus added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557#1301869, @NoQ wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557#1300671, @Szelethus wrote: > > > Nice catch, would you like to make an issue on their project or shall I? > > > I guess it can be an outright pull request :) I'll see if i have time for > that soon, please feel free to take initiative>< I'll do the honors then. :) > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557#1301829, @Szelethus wrote: > >> Yup, there seems to be a desire to keep it around. Let's add an entry to the >> open projects maybe? > > > Mmm, what is the project here? What changes are still necessary? Wasn't the point of this patch to turn off part of this checkers functionality because it's immature just yet? From what I understand it is desired, but the FP rate is a little too high. I guess fixing that is the project. Hmm, actually, tinkering with HTML files might be overkill, especially since sphinx will hopefully end that era. Let's just add a TODO and let me deal with it later when I reorganize the checker options. Sorry for talking nonsense :D https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
