jyknight added a comment. In D55150#1318082 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55150#1318082>, @chandlerc wrote:
> I think this should be `internal-driver-option` and the text updated? I don't > think these are necessarily experimental, they're internals of the compiler > implementation, and not a supported interface for users. Unsure how to best > explain this. Yea, I was trying to figure out a good name. I thought "unsupported" at first, but that is a tricky word, since it has the connotation of "doesn't work in this version", which is not what I mean to imply -- the thing someone wants to do likely does work, but we need to indicate no guarantees about the future. Which is where "experimental" came from -- the options are useful for experimenting with compiler features that are not fully baked. Perhaps "internal" is okay too... CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55150/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55150 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
