NoQ added inline comments.
================ Comment at: test/Analysis/diagnostics/explicit-suppression.cpp:22 #ifndef SUPPRESSED - // expected-warning@../Inputs/system-header-simulator-cxx.h:670 {{Called C++ object pointer is null}} + // expected-warning@../Inputs/system-header-simulator-cxx.h:677 {{Called C++ object pointer is null}} #endif ---------------- Szelethus wrote: > Szelethus wrote: > > NoQ wrote: > > > Szelethus wrote: > > > > Can't we just change this to `// expected-warning{{Called C++ object > > > > pointer is null}}`? This file is so tiny, I think it wouldn't cause > > > > much confusion, and reduces unnecessary maintenance work. > > > I don't think it'll work. The warning is not on this line, it is in > > > `system-header-simulator-cxx.h`, so we need to specify it somehow, and > > > it'll appear only in this test, not in other tests that include that > > > header, so we can't put it directly into the header. > > Ah, okay. > Buuuuut since this is the only warning in the file, we could get away with it > of we use `FileCheck`! But I leave it up to you. > > I had a lot of bots breaking on me because I forgot `git add` on this file > once, so I might end up fixing it myself. Mmm, maybe. This test is tiny enough. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55307/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55307 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits