rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM with `s/ConstantExpr/FullExpr/`.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Expr.cpp:2550
}
+ if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(E)) {
+ E = CE->getSubExpr();
----------------
Does this pass the tests if you use `FullExpr` here instead? I don't think we
should be treating `ConstantExpr` and other `FullExpr`s differently.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55853/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55853
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
