krytarowski added a comment. In D56215#1345695 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215#1345695>, @ruiu wrote:
> In D56215#1345417 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215#1345417>, @joerg wrote: > > > Talking from the perspective of having had to deal with thousands of > > packages in pkgsrc over the years: it is naive to believe that there isn't > > a lot of software that calls the linker directly for various reasons. As > > such, it is very important to have a useful configuration in the linker by > > default. Such a configuration is by its very nature target specific. This > > doesn't mean it can't be done in a cross-compiler friendly way, on the > > contrary. Over the years NetBSD has been pushing its toolchain to be as > > similar for the native build and a cross-target as reasonable possible. > > Modulo the build time choices in the config.h sense, the only difference > > between the native and cross tools is the built-in default of the former. > > > It might be naive but I don't think it's too naive. Most programs use ld via > cc, and I don't think it is too unreasonable to not implement a host-specific > logic for a very small percentage of programs that directly use ld. If we do, > that logic would be the same or very similar to the one that we already have > in cc. I think we should avoid that duplication of the host-specific config > in the toolchain. > > I see there are pros and cons to not have host-specific config in ld. That > said, if other operating systems can live without host-specific config in > lld, why can't NetBSD do? I really don't like to be in a situation where only > one operating system have a host-specific config while others don't. Before we even can start a philosophical dispute, is there some way to even get that setup functional in lld? How to check if the target is supposed to be a NetBSD binary? @mgorny raised some proposals.. https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215#1345563 but all of them seem to be either dysfunctional (ifdefs) or hackish (renaming emul names or renaming lld binary name to netbsd-*). Looking at the code of lld, the detection of FreeBSD is done by checking emulation name (*fbsd) and anything else by a flag passed to a linker such as `--do-something-for-android` (e.g. "use-android-relr-tags") CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56215 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
