martong added a comment.

Just a quick note. We are pretty sure that `StructuralEquivalency` can have 
false positive results, i.e. it can report two decls as nonequivalent falsely. 
My understanding is that we should report an error only if we are absolutely 
certain that an error has happened, this is not the case with 
`StructuralEquivalency`. Consequently this should be a warning in Sema 
(modules) too.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D55646/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D55646



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to