JonasToth added a comment. In D56444#1350746 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444#1350746>, @sammccall wrote:
> In D56444#1350252 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444#1350252>, @JonasToth wrote: > > > I still see the unit-test crashing for `ExprMutAnalyzer` (just apply the > > last two tests > > https://github.com/JonasToth/clang/blob/fix_crash/unittests/Analysis/ExprMutationAnalyzerTest.cpp > > and run `check-clang-unit`) > > > The `ReproduceFailure11` test passes for me, and the > `ReproduceFailureMinimal` fails to compile (`a&&`). Wupsi, thats odd. I am currently not at my PC and can't fix, but it seems that it should be `"template <class T> T forward(T & A) { return static_cast<T&&>(A); }"` instead of `a&&`. If you have the time to try again, great! Otherwise I will check this evening (8:00-9:00 evening berlin timezone). >> The clang-tidy check does not crash anymore, but `readability-function-size` >> regresses. It probably doesn't properly count for lambdas anymore. > > Rather, it previously **didn't** count lambda bodies as functions (because > `functionDecl()` didn't include them), and now it does :-) > I think counting them is better behavior, but I've modified the matcher to > preserve the behavior for now. > > @klimek: would it be better to preserve the odd behavior of the > `functionDecl()` matcher, and add a new `functionOrLambdaDecl()`? It seems > too surprising to me. We can change the clang-tidy check as well. I think lambdas should be considered functionDecls, shouldnt they? WDYT @aaron.ballman ? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
