Sorry to bring more bad news, but merging this seems to have regressed a clangd test on the branch (I didn't notice at the time, because I ran the wrong set of tests, d'oh).
I've searched my inbox but couldn't find any recent commits touching the test. Do you have any idea what might be happening? ******************** TEST 'Extra Tools Unit Tests :: clangd/./ClangdTests/GoToInclude.All' FAILED ******************** Note: Google Test filter = GoToInclude.All [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 1 test from GoToInclude [ RUN ] GoToInclude.All /work/llvm-8/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clangd/XRefsTests.cpp:1086: Failure Value of: *Locations Expected: has 1 element that file range ("/clangd-test/foo.h", 0:0-0:0) Actual: {} /work/llvm-8/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clangd/XRefsTests.cpp:1096: Failure Value of: *Locations Expected: has 1 element that file range ("/clangd-test/foo.h", 0:0-0:0) Actual: {} /work/llvm-8/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clangd/XRefsTests.cpp:1101: Failure Value of: *Locations Expected: has 1 element that file range ("/clangd-test/foo.h", 0:0-0:0) Actual: {} [ FAILED ] GoToInclude.All (14 ms) [----------] 1 test from GoToInclude (14 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (14 ms total) [ PASSED ] 0 tests. [ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below: [ FAILED ] GoToInclude.All 1 FAILED TEST Updating file /clangd-test/foo.h with command [/clangd-test] clang -ffreestanding /clangd-test/foo.h Updating file /clangd-test/foo.cpp with command [/clangd-test] clang -ffreestanding /clangd-test/foo.cpp Preamble for file /clangd-test/foo.h cannot be reused. Attempting to rebuild it. Preamble for file /clangd-test/foo.cpp cannot be reused. Attempting to rebuild it. Built preamble of size 169108 for file /clangd-test/foo.h Built preamble of size 173056 for file /clangd-test/foo.cpp ******************** Testing Time: 5.30s ******************** Failing Tests (1): Extra Tools Unit Tests :: clangd/./ClangdTests/GoToInclude.All Expected Passes : 1123 Expected Failures : 1 Unsupported Tests : 3 Unexpected Failures: 1 On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:18 AM Hans Wennborg <h...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Merged to 8.0 in r352225. > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Sam McCall via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Author: sammccall > > Date: Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019 > > New Revision: 352079 > > > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=352079&view=rev > > Log: > > [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak. > > > > Summary: > > r347205 fixed a bug in FileManager: first calling > > getFile(shouldOpen=false) and then getFile(shouldOpen=true) results in > > the file not being open. > > > > Unfortunately, some code was (inadvertently?) relying on this bug: when > > building with a PCH, the file entries are obtained first by passing > > shouldOpen=false, and then later shouldOpen=true, without any intention > > of reading them. After r347205, they do get unneccesarily opened. > > Aside from extra operations, this means they need to be closed. Normally > > files are closed when their contents are read. As these files are never > > read, they stay open until clang exits. On platforms with a low > > open-files limit (e.g. Mac), this can lead to spurious file-not-found > > errors when building large projects with PCH enabled, e.g. > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=924225 > > > > Fixing the callsites to pass shouldOpen=false when the file won't be > > read is not quite trivial (that info isn't available at the direct > > callsite), and passing shouldOpen=false is a performance regression (it > > results in open+fstat pairs being replaced by stat+open). > > > > So an ideal fix is going to be a little risky and we need some fix soon > > (especially for the llvm 8 branch). > > The problem addressed by r347205 is rare and has only been observed in > > clangd. It was present in llvm-7, so we can live with it for now. > > > > Reviewers: bkramer, thakis > > > > Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, kadircet, cfe-commits > > > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57165 > > > > Added: > > cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles > > Modified: > > cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h > > cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp > > cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp > > > > Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h > > URL: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h?rev=352079&r1=352078&r2=352079&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h (original) > > +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019 > > @@ -69,15 +69,14 @@ class FileEntry { > > bool IsNamedPipe; > > bool InPCH; > > bool IsValid; // Is this \c FileEntry initialized and > > valid? > > - bool DeferredOpen; // Created by getFile(OpenFile=0); may open > > later. > > > > /// The open file, if it is owned by the \p FileEntry. > > mutable std::unique_ptr<llvm::vfs::File> File; > > > > public: > > FileEntry() > > - : UniqueID(0, 0), IsNamedPipe(false), InPCH(false), IsValid(false), > > - DeferredOpen(false) {} > > + : UniqueID(0, 0), IsNamedPipe(false), InPCH(false), IsValid(false) > > + {} > > > > FileEntry(const FileEntry &) = delete; > > FileEntry &operator=(const FileEntry &) = delete; > > > > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp > > URL: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp?rev=352079&r1=352078&r2=352079&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp (original) > > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019 > > @@ -188,21 +188,15 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St > > *SeenFileEntries.insert(std::make_pair(Filename, nullptr)).first; > > > > // See if there is already an entry in the map. > > - if (NamedFileEnt.second) { > > - if (NamedFileEnt.second == NON_EXISTENT_FILE) > > - return nullptr; > > - // Entry exists: return it *unless* it wasn't opened and open is > > requested. > > - if (!(NamedFileEnt.second->DeferredOpen && openFile)) > > - return NamedFileEnt.second; > > - // We previously stat()ed the file, but didn't open it: do that below. > > - // FIXME: the below does other redundant work too (stats the dir and > > file). > > - } else { > > - // By default, initialize it to invalid. > > - NamedFileEnt.second = NON_EXISTENT_FILE; > > - } > > + if (NamedFileEnt.second) > > + return NamedFileEnt.second == NON_EXISTENT_FILE ? nullptr > > + : NamedFileEnt.second; > > > > ++NumFileCacheMisses; > > > > + // By default, initialize it to invalid. > > + NamedFileEnt.second = NON_EXISTENT_FILE; > > + > > // Get the null-terminated file name as stored as the key of the > > // SeenFileEntries map. > > StringRef InterndFileName = NamedFileEnt.first(); > > @@ -240,7 +234,6 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St > > // It exists. See if we have already opened a file with the same inode. > > // This occurs when one dir is symlinked to another, for example. > > FileEntry &UFE = UniqueRealFiles[Data.UniqueID]; > > - UFE.DeferredOpen = !openFile; > > > > NamedFileEnt.second = &UFE; > > > > @@ -257,15 +250,6 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St > > InterndFileName = NamedFileEnt.first().data(); > > } > > > > - // If we opened the file for the first time, record the resulting info. > > - // Do this even if the cache entry was valid, maybe we didn't previously > > open. > > - if (F && !UFE.File) { > > - if (auto PathName = F->getName()) > > - fillRealPathName(&UFE, *PathName); > > - UFE.File = std::move(F); > > - assert(!UFE.DeferredOpen && "we just opened it!"); > > - } > > - > > if (UFE.isValid()) { // Already have an entry with this inode, return it. > > > > // FIXME: this hack ensures that if we look up a file by a virtual > > path in > > @@ -296,9 +280,13 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St > > UFE.UniqueID = Data.UniqueID; > > UFE.IsNamedPipe = Data.IsNamedPipe; > > UFE.InPCH = Data.InPCH; > > + UFE.File = std::move(F); > > UFE.IsValid = true; > > - // Note File and DeferredOpen were initialized above. > > > > + if (UFE.File) { > > + if (auto PathName = UFE.File->getName()) > > + fillRealPathName(&UFE, *PathName); > > + } > > return &UFE; > > } > > > > @@ -370,7 +358,6 @@ FileManager::getVirtualFile(StringRef Fi > > UFE->UID = NextFileUID++; > > UFE->IsValid = true; > > UFE->File.reset(); > > - UFE->DeferredOpen = false; > > return UFE; > > } > > > > > > Added: cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles > > URL: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles?rev=352079&view=auto > > ============================================================================== > > --- cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles (added) > > +++ cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019 > > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ > > +// Test that compiling using a PCH doesn't leak file descriptors. > > +// https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=924225 > > +// > > +// This test requires bash loops and ulimit. > > +// REQUIRES: shell > > +// UNSUPPORTED: win32 > > +// > > +// Set up source files. lib/lib.h includes lots of lib*.h files in that > > dir. > > +// client.c includes lib/lib.h, and also the individual files directly. > > +// > > +// RUN: rm -rf %t > > +// RUN: mkdir %t > > +// RUN: cd %t > > +// RUN: mkdir lib > > +// RUN: for i in {1..300}; do touch lib/lib$i.h; done > > +// RUN: for i in {1..300}; do echo "#include \"lib$i.h\"" >> lib/lib.h; > > done > > +// RUN: echo "#include \"lib/lib.h\"" > client.c > > +// RUN: for i in {1..300}; do echo "#include \"lib/lib$i.h\"" >> client.c; > > done > > +// > > +// We want to verify that we don't hold all the files open at the same > > time. > > +// This is important e.g. on mac, which has a low default FD limit. > > +// RUN: ulimit -n 100 > > +// > > +// Test without PCH. > > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Ilib/ client.c > > +// > > +// Test with PCH. > > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-pch -o pch -Ilib/ client.c > > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -include-pch pch -Ilib/ client.c -fsyntax-only > > > > Modified: cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp > > URL: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp?rev=352079&r1=352078&r2=352079&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp (original) > > +++ cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019 > > @@ -221,33 +221,6 @@ TEST_F(FileManagerTest, getFileReturnsNU > > EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, file); > > } > > > > -// When calling getFile(OpenFile=false); getFile(OpenFile=true) the file is > > -// opened for the second call. > > -TEST_F(FileManagerTest, getFileDefersOpen) { > > - llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem> FS( > > - new llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem()); > > - FS->addFile("/tmp/test", 0, > > llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy("test")); > > - FS->addFile("/tmp/testv", 0, > > llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy("testv")); > > - FileManager manager(options, FS); > > - > > - const FileEntry *file = manager.getFile("/tmp/test", /*OpenFile=*/false); > > - ASSERT_TRUE(file != nullptr); > > - ASSERT_TRUE(file->isValid()); > > - // "real path name" reveals whether the file was actually opened. > > - EXPECT_FALSE(file->isOpenForTests()); > > - > > - file = manager.getFile("/tmp/test", /*OpenFile=*/true); > > - ASSERT_TRUE(file != nullptr); > > - ASSERT_TRUE(file->isValid()); > > - EXPECT_TRUE(file->isOpenForTests()); > > - > > - // However we should never try to open a file previously opened as > > virtual. > > - ASSERT_TRUE(manager.getVirtualFile("/tmp/testv", 5, 0)); > > - ASSERT_TRUE(manager.getFile("/tmp/testv", /*OpenFile=*/false)); > > - file = manager.getFile("/tmp/testv", /*OpenFile=*/true); > > - EXPECT_FALSE(file->isOpenForTests()); > > -} > > - > > // The following tests apply to Unix-like system only. > > > > #ifndef _WIN32 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-commits mailing list > > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits