mgorny added a comment. In D56554#1369606 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554#1369606>, @mgorny wrote:
> In D56554#1369592 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554#1369592>, @ruiu wrote: > > > No, I'm suggesting you add execstack, noexecstack and nognustack as a > > tri-state -z flag. Does this sound good? > > > Do you mean that of those three options, the last one specified should take > precedence? (and, if yes, could you suggest how to implement it? `getZOption()` doesn't seem suitable. Repository: rLLD LLVM Linker CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56554 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
