krytarowski added a comment. In D56650#1377546 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56650#1377546>, @ruiu wrote:
> If you still need to patch GNU ld, it doesn't seems like this patch makes > things easier for you. (But even if this would make it easier for you, this > patch's approach is not okay by design though.) If we can get standalone lld functional out of the box and respecting target, we no longer need to patch GCC/LD/distribution/3rd-party-software. If there is a strong feeling to retain lld ELF target as it is, we can grow a custom target like Darwin/Windows and specify customization there. The mentioned Darwin adds /usr/lib in the linker directly. We need analogous opportunity on our end. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56650/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
