shiva0217 added a comment. Herald added a project: clang. In D57497#1378511 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57497#1378511>, @simoncook wrote:
> As this mllvm option only affects the creation of ELF objects, do we also > need to add a similar option for the LTO case, as the -G value would have no > effect otherwise? Hi Simon, I think you're right, we may need a way to pass -G value for the LTO. One possible solution is adding passing code in `AddGoldPlugin`, but there's no other target specific code. I can't find other targets passing their `cl::opt` flags through the LTO. Any suggestions? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57497/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57497 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
