dgoldman added a comment. In D56924#1379342 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924#1379342>, @arphaman wrote:
> Do you know if this have an effect on the output of completion results or > other tooling-based output? > > A couple of requests: > > - This behavior should be controlled by a printing policy flag > `SupressUnwrittenScope` (specifically for the '::(class extension)'). > - I also agree with Sam's comment. The property should still be qualified by > the class name as well, e.g. `Obj::(class extension)::property`. It's possible - clangd for instance was crashing because of the current behavior: ::property instead of Obj::property or (class extension)::property. - Added although see below - I've modified this to be more in line with the current handling of Objc methods, but this no longer outputs the "(class extension)", do you think it should output both? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
