michaelplatings added a comment. In D57896#1389067 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896#1389067>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> 1. Does clang-tidy warn on every single existing variable now? > 2. It might be best to give this more visibility, by submitting a mail to > llvm-dev, with a **noticeable** subject, like "RFC: changing variable naming > rules in LLVM codebase" 1. Pretty much. Previously clang-tidy gave 56,787 unique warnings. After this patch it gives 361,382 unique warnings. I personally would be happy to change the settings from `camelBack` to `aNy_CasE`. 2. Done: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
