thakis added a comment.
Herald added a project: clang.

Did you see the "Should we remove this check that currently requires 
ENABLE_ARCMT => ENABLE_SA? 
http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/tools/clang/CMakeLists.txt#441"; question?

In D57127#1373949 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57127#1373949>, @george.karpenkov 
wrote:

> @thakis Sorry I don't understand your point. At the end of the day, 
> ProgramPoint and BodyFarm are only used by the static analyzer.


They are used by StaticAnalyzer/Core, which clang does depend on.

> If you disagree, what is your proposed directory structure? What would be the 
> benefits?

I'd put this in a library that isn't linked into clang. The benefit is that 
it's easier to keep clang itself small(er) that way.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57127/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57127



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to