shiva0217 added a comment. In D57497#1394137 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57497#1394137>, @efriedma wrote:
> > Did you mean declare as a target feature in RISCV.td or I misunderstanding > > something? > > That's sort of the right idea, but I don't think it works in this context > because we aren't trying to change the generated code for a function; we > actually need to stick the global into a specific section. Maybe worth > sending an email to llvmdev to discuss the right way to represent this in IR? Hi Eli, I have sent the email to llvmdev http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130222.html. It seems that there're not much consensus on how to represent in IR. I incline to implement passing through `-plugin-opt=` as the first version. We could create an incremental patch when we have more consensus on IR approach. What do you think? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57497/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57497 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
