mgorny marked an inline comment as done. mgorny added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/NetBSD.cpp:430 + // system install from src + getDriver().SysRoot + "/usr/include/c++", + }; ---------------- krytarowski wrote: > mgorny wrote: > > krytarowski wrote: > > > I propose to go for: > > > > > > `getDriver().SysRoot + "/usr/include/c++/v1",` with a fallback for > > > `getDriver().SysRoot + "/usr/include/c++",` > > > > > > This innocent customization of paths triggers a lot of headache. > > > > > > We should switch system location to `/usr/include/c++/v1` for next > > > version of LLVM (9.0 as 8.0 is branched and will be released soon). > > > > > > This way we will keep compat with legacy paths and new clang. > > This is already handled by the relative path (when `getDriver().Dir` is > > `/usr/bin`). > We still can build newer Clang in pkgsrc on newer base with headers moved to > `/usr/include/v1/c++` and it will break. I don't understand. Why would it break? (besides the typo in the path) Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58592/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58592 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
