djtodoro added a comment. @lebedev.ri I agree, thank you! I needed to be more precise in my previous reply, sorry for that. I thought it will be (somehow) overhead if I change existing, very basic, matchers.
I already implemented a static function that skips comma operands, and extended this to support member calls, functions, etc. But, implementing it as a new matcher sounds like better idea. Thanks! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58894/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58894 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
