hans added a comment. In D59038#1422890 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59038#1422890>, @rsmith wrote:
> LGTM, and I think this is safe enough to take for Clang 8. Do you think the severity is high enough to spin another release candidate? My concern is that since this didn't show up in testing until now, which I guess is quite a while after it regressed, maybe it's not important enough to delay the already late release? Also it sounds like it isn't completely fixed yet.. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59038/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59038 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
