modocache updated this revision to Diff 190718.
modocache added a comment.

Thank you for the reviews! This revision fixes the nested try/catch behavior. I 
still need to modify this such that semantic analysis continues for the rest of 
the function body.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076

Files:
  include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
  include/clang/Sema/Scope.h
  lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
  lib/Sema/Scope.cpp
  lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp
  test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp

Index: test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp
+++ test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp
@@ -328,6 +328,47 @@
 // not allowed. A user may not understand that this is "outside a function."
 void default_argument(int arg = co_await 0) {} // expected-error {{'co_await' cannot be used outside a function}}
 
+void await_in_catch_coroutine() {
+  try { // Expect a note diagnostic here.
+  } catch (...) {
+    []() -> void { co_await a; }(); // OK
+    co_await a; // expected-error {{'co_await' cannot be used in the handler of a try block}}
+  }
+}
+
+void await_nested_in_catch_coroutine() {
+  try { // Expect a note diagnostic here.
+  } catch (...) {
+    try {
+      co_await a; // expected-error {{'co_await' cannot be used in the handler of a try block}}
+      []() -> void { co_await a; }(); // OK
+    } catch (...) {
+      co_return 123;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+void await_in_lambda_in_catch_coroutine() {
+  try {
+  } catch (...) {
+    []() -> void { co_await a; }(); // OK
+  }
+}
+
+void yield_in_catch_coroutine() {
+  try {
+  } catch (...) {
+    co_yield a; // expected-error {{'co_yield' cannot be used in the handler of a try block}}
+  }
+}
+
+void return_in_catch_coroutine() {
+  try {
+  } catch (...) {
+    co_return 123; // OK
+  }
+}
+
 constexpr auto constexpr_deduced_return_coroutine() {
   co_yield 0; // expected-error {{'co_yield' cannot be used in a constexpr function}}
   // expected-error@-1 {{'co_yield' cannot be used in a function with a deduced return type}}
Index: lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp
@@ -185,21 +185,8 @@
 
 static bool isValidCoroutineContext(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
                                     StringRef Keyword) {
-  // 'co_await' and 'co_yield' are not permitted in unevaluated operands,
-  // such as subexpressions of \c sizeof.
-  //
-  // [expr.await]p2, emphasis added: "An await-expression shall appear only in
-  // a *potentially evaluated* expression within the compound-statement of a
-  // function-body outside of a handler [...] A context within a function where
-  // an await-expression can appear is called a suspension context of the
-  // function." And per [expr.yield]p1: "A yield-expression shall appear only
-  // within a suspension context of a function."
-  if (S.isUnevaluatedContext()) {
-    S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_coroutine_unevaluated_context) << Keyword;
-    return false;
-  }
-
-  // Per [expr.await]p2, any other usage must be within a function.
+  // [expr.await]p2 dictates that 'co_await' and 'co_yield' must be used within
+  // a function body.
   // FIXME: This also covers [expr.await]p2: "An await-expression shall not
   // appear in a default argument." But the diagnostic QoI here could be
   // improved to inform the user that default arguments specifically are not
@@ -668,8 +655,59 @@
   return true;
 }
 
+// Recursively walks up the scope hierarchy until either a 'catch' or a function
+// scope is found, whichever comes first.
+static bool isWithinCatchScope(Scope *S) {
+  // 'co_await' and 'co_yield' keywords are disallowed within catch blocks, but
+  // lambdas that use 'co_await' are allowed. The loop below ends when a
+  // function scope is found in order to ensure the following behavior:
+  //
+  // void foo() {      // <- function scope
+  //   try {           //
+  //     co_await x;   // <- 'co_await' is OK within a function scope
+  //   } catch {       // <- catch scope
+  //     co_await x;   // <- 'co_await' is not OK within a catch scope
+  //     []() {        // <- function scope
+  //       co_await x; // <- 'co_await' is OK within a function scope
+  //     }();
+  //   }
+  // }
+  while (S && !(S->getFlags() & Scope::FnScope)) {
+    if (S->getFlags() & Scope::CatchScope)
+      return true;
+    S = S->getParent();
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+// [expr.await]p2, emphasis added: "An await-expression shall appear only in
+// a *potentially evaluated* expression within the compound-statement of a
+// function-body *outside of a handler* [...] A context within a function
+// where an await-expression can appear is called a suspension context of the
+// function."
+static bool isValidSuspensionContext(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
+                                     StringRef Keyword,
+                                     bool IsImplicit = false) {
+  // First emphasis of [expr.await]p2: must be a potentially evaluated context.
+  // That is, 'co_await' and 'co_yield' cannot appear in subexpressions of
+  // \c sizeof.
+  if (S.isUnevaluatedContext()) {
+    S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_coroutine_unevaluated_context) << Keyword;
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  // Second emphasis of [expr.await]p2: must be outside of an exception handler.
+  if (isWithinCatchScope(S.getCurScope())) {
+    S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_coroutine_within_handler) << Keyword;
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  return true;
+}
+
 ExprResult Sema::ActOnCoawaitExpr(Scope *S, SourceLocation Loc, Expr *E) {
-  if (!ActOnCoroutineBodyStart(S, Loc, "co_await")) {
+  if (!ActOnCoroutineBodyStart(S, Loc, "co_await") ||
+      !isValidSuspensionContext(*this, Loc, "co_await")) {
     CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr(E);
     return ExprError();
   }
@@ -689,7 +727,7 @@
 ExprResult Sema::BuildUnresolvedCoawaitExpr(SourceLocation Loc, Expr *E,
                                             UnresolvedLookupExpr *Lookup) {
   auto *FSI = checkCoroutineContext(*this, Loc, "co_await");
-  if (!FSI)
+  if (!FSI || !isValidSuspensionContext(*this, Loc, "co_await"))
     return ExprError();
 
   if (E->getType()->isPlaceholderType()) {
@@ -766,7 +804,8 @@
 }
 
 ExprResult Sema::ActOnCoyieldExpr(Scope *S, SourceLocation Loc, Expr *E) {
-  if (!ActOnCoroutineBodyStart(S, Loc, "co_yield")) {
+  if (!ActOnCoroutineBodyStart(S, Loc, "co_yield") ||
+      !isValidSuspensionContext(*this, Loc, "co_yield")) {
     CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr(E);
     return ExprError();
   }
Index: lib/Sema/Scope.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/Scope.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/Scope.cpp
@@ -166,7 +166,9 @@
       {SEHExceptScope, "SEHExceptScope"},
       {SEHFilterScope, "SEHFilterScope"},
       {CompoundStmtScope, "CompoundStmtScope"},
-      {ClassInheritanceScope, "ClassInheritanceScope"}};
+      {ClassInheritanceScope, "ClassInheritanceScope"},
+      {CatchScope, "CatchScope"},
+  };
 
   for (auto Info : FlagInfo) {
     if (Flags & Info.first) {
Index: lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
+++ lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
@@ -2260,8 +2260,10 @@
   // C++ 3.3.2p3:
   // The name in a catch exception-declaration is local to the handler and
   // shall not be redeclared in the outermost block of the handler.
-  ParseScope CatchScope(this, Scope::DeclScope | Scope::ControlScope |
-                          (FnCatch ? Scope::FnTryCatchScope : 0));
+  unsigned ScopeFlags = Scope::DeclScope | Scope::ControlScope |
+                        Scope::CatchScope |
+                        (FnCatch ? Scope::FnTryCatchScope : 0);
+  ParseScope CatchScope(this, ScopeFlags);
 
   // exception-declaration is equivalent to '...' or a parameter-declaration
   // without default arguments.
@@ -2290,7 +2292,7 @@
     return StmtError(Diag(Tok, diag::err_expected) << tok::l_brace);
 
   // FIXME: Possible draft standard bug: attribute-specifier should be allowed?
-  StmtResult Block(ParseCompoundStatement());
+  StmtResult Block(ParseCompoundStatement(/*isStmtExpr=*/false, ScopeFlags));
   if (Block.isInvalid())
     return Block;
 
Index: include/clang/Sema/Scope.h
===================================================================
--- include/clang/Sema/Scope.h
+++ include/clang/Sema/Scope.h
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@
 
     /// We are between inheritance colon and the real class/struct definition scope.
     ClassInheritanceScope = 0x800000,
+
+    /// This is the scope of a C++ catch statement.
+    CatchScope = 0x1000000,
   };
 
 private:
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===================================================================
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -9251,6 +9251,8 @@
   "Objective-C methods as coroutines are not yet supported">;
 def err_coroutine_unevaluated_context : Error<
   "'%0' cannot be used in an unevaluated context">;
+def err_coroutine_within_handler : Error<
+  "'%0' cannot be used in the handler of a try block">;
 def err_coroutine_outside_function : Error<
   "'%0' cannot be used outside a function">;
 def err_coroutine_invalid_func_context : Error<
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to