Hi,

I'll try to fix this ASAP!

It sounds as if i don't have nearly enough C++17 codebases for testing, are there any obvious open-source projects that you could recommend? I'd love to try to reincarnate http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/Experimental/job/StaticAnalyzerBenchmarks/ with those.

On 3/19/19 9:37 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
Filed this as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41142. Any hope for a prompt fix here?

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:34 PM Alexander Kornienko <ale...@google.com <mailto:ale...@google.com>> wrote:

    A reduced test case:
    $ cat test-RegionStoreManager__bindStruct.cc
    struct a {};
    class b : a {};
    b c() { b d{c()}; }
    $ ./clang-tidy -checks="-*,clang-analyzer*"
    test-RegionStoreManager__bindStruct.cc -- -std=c++17
    assert.h assertion failed at
    tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:2362 in
    (anonymous namespace)::RegionBindingsRef (anonym
    ous
    namespace)::RegionStoreManager::bindStruct(RegionBindingsConstRef,
    const clang::ento::TypedValueRegion *, clang::ento::SVal):
    CRD->isAggregate() && "Non-aggregates are constructed with a
    constructor!"
        @     0x559908170326  __assert_fail
        @     0x5599068d4854  (anonymous
    namespace)::RegionStoreManager::bindStruct()
        @     0x5599068c93c8  (anonymous
    namespace)::RegionStoreManager::Bind()
        @     0x5599068b409f clang::ento::ProgramState::bindLoc()
        @     0x559906865935
    clang::ento::ExprEngine::processPointerEscapedOnBind()
        @     0x55990685d4b3 clang::ento::ExprEngine::evalBind()
        @     0x559906872a43 clang::ento::ExprEngine::VisitDeclStmt()
        @     0x55990685c16f clang::ento::ExprEngine::Visit()
        @     0x559906858b1f clang::ento::ExprEngine::ProcessStmt()
        @     0x559906858808 clang::ento::ExprEngine::processCFGElement()
        @     0x55990684cb65 clang::ento::CoreEngine::HandlePostStmt()
        @     0x55990684bf5c clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList()
        @     0x5599065b635b  (anonymous
    namespace)::AnalysisConsumer::HandleCode()
        @     0x5599065a0135  (anonymous
    namespace)::AnalysisConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit()
        @     0x559906bb7cbc
    clang::MultiplexConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit()
        @     0x559906d226d4  clang::ParseAST()
        @     0x559906b98a83 clang::FrontendAction::Execute()
        @     0x559906b31cd1 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction()
        @     0x559906a9cf61
    clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation()
        @     0x55990620cc07
    clang::tidy::runClangTidy()::ActionFactory::runInvocation()
        @     0x559906a9ccca
    clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation()
        @     0x559906a9c646 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run()
        @     0x559906a9ef22 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run()
        @     0x559906207ecf  clang::tidy::runClangTidy()
        @     0x559902d47c45  main

    On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:14 AM Alexander Kornienko
    <ale...@google.com <mailto:ale...@google.com>> wrote:

        On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:21 AM Artem Dergachev via
        cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
        <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:

            Author: dergachev
            Date: Thu Mar 14 17:22:59 2019
            New Revision: 356222

            URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=356222&view=rev
            Log:
            [analyzer] Support C++17 aggregates with bases without
            constructors.

            RegionStore now knows how to bind a nonloc::CompoundVal
            that represents the
            value of an aggregate initializer when it has its initial
            segment of sub-values
            correspond to base classes.

            Additionally, fixes the crash from pr40022.

            Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59054

            Modified:
            cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp
            cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp

            Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp
            URL:
            
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp?rev=356222&r1=356221&r2=356222&view=diff
            
==============================================================================
            --- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp
            (original)
            +++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp Thu
            Mar 14 17:22:59 2019
            @@ -2334,12 +2334,57 @@ RegionBindingsRef
            RegionStoreManager::bi
               if (V.isUnknown() || !V.getAs<nonloc::CompoundVal>())
                 return bindAggregate(B, R, UnknownVal());

            +  // The raw CompoundVal is essentially a symbolic
            InitListExpr: an (immutable)
            +  // list of other values. It appears pretty much only
            when there's an actual
            +  // initializer list expression in the program, and the
            analyzer tries to
            +  // unwrap it as soon as possible.
            +  // This code is where such unwrap happens: when the
            compound value is put into
            +  // the object that it was supposed to initialize (it's
            an *initializer* list,
            +  // after all), instead of binding the whole value to
            the whole object, we bind
            +  // sub-values to sub-objects. Sub-values may themselves
            be compound values,
            +  // and in this case the procedure becomes recursive.
            +  // FIXME: The annoying part about compound values is
            that they don't carry
            +  // any sort of information about which value
            corresponds to which sub-object.
            +  // It's simply a list of values in the middle of
            nowhere; we expect to match
            +  // them to sub-objects, essentially, "by index": first
            value binds to
            +  // the first field, second value binds to the second
            field, etc.
            +  // It would have been much safer to organize non-lazy
            compound values as
            +  // a mapping from fields/bases to values.
               const nonloc::CompoundVal& CV =
            V.castAs<nonloc::CompoundVal>();
               nonloc::CompoundVal::iterator VI = CV.begin(), VE =
            CV.end();

            -  RecordDecl::field_iterator FI, FE;
               RegionBindingsRef NewB(B);

            +  // In C++17 aggregates may have base classes, handle
            those as well.
            +  // They appear before fields in the initializer list /
            compound value.
            +  if (const auto *CRD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RD)) {
            +    assert(CRD->isAggregate() &&
            +           "Non-aggregates are constructed with a
            constructor!");


        Now we see this assertion being triggered on a substantial
        number of files in our codebase:
        llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:2362
        in (anonymous namespace)::RegionBindingsRef (anonymous
        namespace)::RegionStoreManager::bindStruct(RegionBindingsConstRef,
        const clang::ento::TypedValueRegion *, clang::ento::SVal):
        CRD->isAggregate() && "Non-aggregates are constructed with a
        constructor!"
        Stack trace:
            @     0x5596b00a84e6         96 __assert_fail
            @     0x5596b6e6ea14        304 (anonymous
        namespace)::RegionStoreManager::bindStruct()
            @     0x5596afb30228        128 (anonymous
        namespace)::RegionStoreManager::Bind()
            @     0x5596af822abf        128
        clang::ento::ProgramState::bindLoc()
            @     0x5596b6e2b657        112
        clang::ento::ExprEngine::processPointerEscapedOnBind()
            @     0x5596b907f65f        512
        clang::ento::ExprEngine::evalBind()
            @     0x5596b6e30ea7        560
        clang::ento::ExprEngine::VisitDeclStmt()
            @     0x5596b8da1fe2        752
        clang::ento::ExprEngine::Visit()
            @     0x5596b8d9cb2f        400
        clang::ento::ExprEngine::ProcessStmt()
            @     0x5596af78431e        112
        clang::ento::ExprEngine::processCFGElement()
            @     0x5596af6578e0         48
        clang::ento::CoreEngine::HandlePostStmt()
            @     0x5596b03b151b        272
        clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList()
            @     0x5596af6f8efe       1248 (anonymous
        namespace)::AnalysisConsumer::HandleCode()
            @     0x5596b6c54a77        448 (anonymous
        namespace)::AnalysisConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit()
            @     0x5596b706f08c         48
        clang::MultiplexConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit()
            @     0x5596aff72e24        144 clang::ParseAST()
            @     0x5596b7053bc3         48
        clang::FrontendAction::Execute()
            @     0x5596b7002ba0        160
        clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction()
            @     0x5596b6f91a61        464
        clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation()
            @     0x5596b6f917ea         80
        clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation()
            @     0x5596afe70af6       2352
        clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run()

        Trying to get an isolated test case.

            +
            +    for (const auto &B : CRD->bases()) {
            +      // (Multiple inheritance is fine though.)
            +      assert(!B.isVirtual() && "Aggregates cannot have
            virtual base classes!");
            +
            +      if (VI == VE)
            +        break;
            +
            +      QualType BTy = B.getType();
            +      assert(BTy->isStructureOrClassType() && "Base
            classes must be classes!");
            +
            +      const CXXRecordDecl *BRD = BTy->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
            +      assert(BRD && "Base classes must be C++ classes!");
            +
            +      const CXXBaseObjectRegion *BR =
            +          MRMgr.getCXXBaseObjectRegion(BRD, R,
            /*IsVirtual=*/false);
            +
            +      NewB = bindStruct(NewB, BR, *VI);
            +
            +      ++VI;
            +    }
            +  }
            +
            +  RecordDecl::field_iterator FI, FE;
            +
               for (FI = RD->field_begin(), FE = RD->field_end(); FI
            != FE; ++FI) {

                 if (VI == VE)

            Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp
            URL:
            
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp?rev=356222&r1=356221&r2=356222&view=diff
            
==============================================================================
            --- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp (original)
            +++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp Thu
            Mar 14 17:22:59 2019
            @@ -1,7 +1,21 @@
            -// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
            -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection
            -verify -x c %s
            -// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
            -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection
            -verify -x c++ -analyzer-config c++-inlining=constructors %s
            -// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
            -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection
            -DINLINE -verify -x c %s
            -// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
            -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection
            -DINLINE -verify -x c++ -analyzer-config
            c++-inlining=constructors %s
            +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core\
            +// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection -verify\
            +// RUN:                    -x c %s
            +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core\
            +// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection -verify\
            +// RUN:                    -x c++ -std=c++14 %s
            +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core\
            +// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection -verify\
            +// RUN:                    -x c++ -std=c++17 %s
            +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core\
            +// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection -verify\
            +// RUN:                    -DINLINE -x c %s
            +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core\
            +// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection -verify\
            +// RUN:                    -DINLINE -x c++ -std=c++14 %s
            +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core\
            +// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection -verify\
            +// RUN:                    -DINLINE -x c++ -std=c++17 %s

             void clang_analyzer_eval(int);

            @@ -196,4 +210,49 @@ namespace EmptyClass {
               }
             }

            +#if __cplusplus >= 201703L
            +namespace aggregate_inheritance_cxx17 {
            +struct A {
            +  int x;
            +};
            +
            +struct B {
            +  int y;
            +};
            +
            +struct C: B {
            +  int z;
            +};
            +
            +struct D: A, C {
            +  int w;
            +};
            +
            +void foo() {
            +  D d{1, 2, 3, 4};
            +  clang_analyzer_eval(d.x == 1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
            +  clang_analyzer_eval(d.y == 2); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
            +  clang_analyzer_eval(d.z == 3); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
            +  clang_analyzer_eval(d.w == 4); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
            +}
            +} // namespace aggregate_inheritance_cxx17
            +#endif
            +
            +namespace flex_array_inheritance_cxx17 {
            +struct A {
            +  int flexible_array[];
            +};
            +
            +struct B {
            +  long cookie;
            +};
            +
            +struct C : B {
            +  A a;
            +};
            +
            +void foo() {
            +  C c{}; // no-crash
            +}
            +} // namespace flex_array_inheritance_cxx17
             #endif


            _______________________________________________
            cfe-commits mailing list
            cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
            https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to