rjmccall added a comment. In D58514#1435228 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58514#1435228>, @wuhao5 wrote:
> > Okay, so really just a block self-reference. We could really just add a > > feature for that that would avoid both the complexity and the expense of > > the self-capture dance. > > Is there a plan to cover this case? or is it a legitimate use case that Clang > should handle? You are currently relying on something that ARC doesn't guarantee, so the client code should be fixed to explicitly copy the block. I think we would be happy to consider a proposal in the long run to allow blocks to self-reference more easily, which will effectively bypass the problem. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58514/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
