hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120#336430, @rjmccall wrote:
> As I understand it, PPC's long-double (~103 bits of precision) is still > strictly less precise than float128_t (113 bits of precision), so it ought to > be have lower rank. Is there actually a supported platform where this is not > true? If not, we should just add this as another type with higher rank. PPC's long-double has variable precision. It is not strictly less precise than float128_t. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
