Charusso added a comment. In D59121#1448367 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59121#1448367>, @NoQ wrote:
> On second thought, dunno. In the scan-build macro preview it wouldn't show > you UINT32_MAX anyway. Maybe let's keep this behavior. > > Cleaned up the patch a little bit. Somehow on the `Assuming ...` pieces we write out the macro name, and my little code did that too. We could obtain the value but I think your first intention is the correct behaviour. Why are you not using my working example? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59121/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59121 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
