DennisL added a comment. In D60139#1456123 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60139#1456123>, @alexfh wrote:
> Looks like this check would fit better into the `bugprone` module. Excellent suggestion. Thanks. Will follow up with an updated Diff. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60139/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60139 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
