phosek added a comment. In D59168#1469186 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168#1469186>, @jdenny wrote:
> Is there anything I can do to help this patch make progress? I think it's ready to land. I was just waiting if anyone else wants to chime in, but it doesn't seem like. I was also thinking about alternative names for the library path, specifically for headers we use `include/c++` but for libraries we'll now use `lib/clang/<target>` which is not very consistent. I was considering `lib/c++/<target>` instead but that wouldn't work for libomp and I didn't come up with any other better alternatives. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
